Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meisiek, S.
Right arrow Articles by Barry, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Through the Looking Glass of Organizational Theatre: Analogically Mediated Inquiry in Organizations

Stefan Meisiek

Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal, smeisiek{at}fe.unl.pt

Daved Barry

Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal, dbarry{at}fe.unl.pt

Organizational theatre is now widely used as a platform for analogically mediated inquiry and change. Using an alternate template research strategy, we combined interview, visual, and survey methods to study the processes underlying an organizational theatre effort over a year, clarifying how theatre performances analogically affect employees' understanding of their workplace. We identified a `looking glass' effect, where analogies create shifting reflections over time that lead to unpredictably emergent changes in the way employees perceive their organization. Our study not only informs the organizational theatre literature, but addresses broader debates on analogical thinking in organization studies, suggesting that current explanations of analogical processes may be overly restricted both in their scope and their conclusions. Specifically, we propose that compound analogues such as organizational theatre, sculpture and film will not only work differently from more abstract and singular analogues, but create very different effects as well.

Key Words: organizational theatre • analogy • metaphor • process theory • looking glass effect

References

  • Alvesson, Mats 1985 `A critical framework for organizational analysis '. Organization Studies 6: 117—138.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Argyris, Chris, and Donald Schon 1978 Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Reading, MA.: Addison-Wesley
  • Banks,Marcus 2001 Visual methods in social research. London: Sage.
  • Barry, David 1994 `Making the invisible visible: Symbolic means for surfacing unconscious processes in organizations'. Organizational Development Journal 12/4: 37—48.
  • Barry, David 1996 `Artful inquiry: A symbolic constructionist framework for social science research'. Qualitative Inquiry 2/4: 411—438[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Benson, J. Kenneth 1977 `Organizations: A dialectical view'. Administrative Science Quarterly 22: 1—21.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Boal, Augusto 1979 Theatre of the oppressed. London: Pluto Press.
  • Boal, Augusto 1995 The rainbow of desire. The Boal method of theatre and therapy. London: Routledge.
  • Boje, David 1995 `Stories of the storytelling organization: A postmodern analysis of Disney as "Tamara Land'''. Academy of Management Journal 38/4: 997—1035.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Boje, David 2001 Narrative methods for organizational and communication research. London: Sage.
  • Brecht, Berthold 1960 Kleines Organon für Theatre (Little organon for the theatre). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
  • Carroll, Lewis 2000 {1872] Alice in wonderland and through the looking glass. New York: Signet Classics.
  • Clark Timothy, and Ian Mangham 2004a `From dramaturgy to theatre as technology: The case of corporate theatre'. Journal of Management Studies 40/1: 37—59.
  • Clark, Timothy, and Ian Mangham 2004b `Stripping to the undercoat: A review and reflections on a piece of organization theatre'. Organization Studies 25/5: 841—851.[Abstract]
  • Cohen-Cruz, Jan, and Mady Schutzman. 1994 Playing Boal. New York: Routledge Press.
  • Cornelissen, Joep 2004 `What are we playing at? Theatre, organization and the use of metaphor'. Organization Studies 25: 705—736.[Abstract]
  • De Monthoux, Pierre Guillet 1996 `The theatre of war: Art, organization and the aesthetics of strategy'. Studies in Cultures, Organizations, and Societies 2: 147—60.
  • Edmundson, Amy, and Bertrand Moingeon 1998 `From organizational learning to the learning organization'. Management Learning 29: 5—20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Hardy, Cynthia, Ian Palmer, and Nelson Phillips 2000 `Discourse as strategic resource '. Human Relations 53: 1227—1248.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Hazen, Mary Ann 1993 `Towards polyphonic organization'. Journal of Organizational Change Management 6/5: 15—26.[CrossRef]
  • Kamoche, Ken, and Miguel Pinha e Cunha 2001 `Minimal structures: From jazz improvisation to product innovation'. Organization Studies 22: 733—764.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Kan, Melanie, and Ken W. Parry 2004 `Identifying paradox: A grounded theory of leadership in overcoming resistance to change'. The Leadership Quarterly 15/4: 467—491.[CrossRef]
  • Kim, W. Chan, and Renée Mauborgne 2005 Blue ocean strategy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Langley, Ann 1999 `Strategies for theorizing from process data'. Academy of Management Review 24/4 691—710.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Martin, Joanne 2001 Organizational culture: Mapping the terrain. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Meisiek, Stefan 2002 `Situation drama in change management: Types and effects of a new managerial tool'. International Journal of Arts Management 4: 48—55.
  • Meisiek, Stefan 2004 `Which catharsis do they mean? Aristotle, Moreno, Boal and organization theatre'. Organization Studies 25/5: 797—816.[Abstract]
  • Miles, Matthew, and A. Michael Huberman 1994 Qualitative data analysis: An extended sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Nissley, Nick, Steven S. Taylor, and Linda Houden 2004 `The politics of performance in organizational theatre-based training and interventions'. Organization Studies 25/5: 817—839.[Abstract]
  • Oswick, Cliff, Peter Anthony, Tom Keenoy, Iain L. Mangham, and David Grant 2000 `A dialogical analysis of organizational learning '. Journal of Management Studies 37/6: 887—901.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Oswick, Cliff, Tom Keenoy, and David Grant 2002 `Metaphor and analogical reasoning in organization theory: Beyond orthodoxy'. Academy of Management Review 27: 294—303.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Petty, Richard E., and John T. Cacioppo 1986 `Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change'. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Schreyögg, Georg, and Heather Höpfl 2004 `Theatre and organization: Editorial introduction '. Organization Studies 25/5: 691—704.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Schubert, Silke, and Dagmar Fuchs 1999 `Theatre für die Strassenreinigung' in Unternehmenstheatre. Schreyögg, Georg, and Robert Dabitz (eds), 232—241. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
  • Senge, Peter M. 1990 The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.
  • Tsoukas, Haridimos 1993 `Analogical reasoning and knowledge generation in organization theory'. Organization Studies 14: 323—346[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Tsoukas, Haridimos, and Robert Chia 2002 `On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change'. Organization Science 13/5: 567—582.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Wehner, Heike, and Robert Dabitz 1999 `Bedarforientiertes Theatre in Deutschland' in Unternehmenstheatre. Schreyögg, Georg, and Robert Dabitz (eds), 97—153. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
  • Woodward, Robert 2004 `Comic relief: Subversion and catharsis in organizational comedic theatre'. Organization Studies 25/5: 775—795.[Abstract]
  • Yin, Robert. K. 1994 Case study research: Design and methods, 2nd edn. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

This version was published on December 1, 2007

Organization Studies, Vol. 28, No. 12, 1805-1827 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840607078702
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meisiek, S.
Right arrow Articles by Barry, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?