Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huault, I.
Right arrow Articles by Rainelli-Le Montagner, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Market Shaping as an Answer to Ambiguities: The Case of Credit Derivatives

Isabelle Huault

University Paris Dauphine, France, isabelle.huault{at}dauphine.fr

Hélène Rainelli-Le Montagner

Montagner Sorbonne Institute for Business Administration, Paris, France, rainelli.iae{at}univ-paris1.fr

Building on Smith (1989), we describe the social processes surrounding a new financial OTC derivatives market,3 the market for credit derivatives. We show that in contradiction to more traditional derivatives, credit derivatives generate ambiguities of a cognitive and political nature. By conducting an in-depth longitudinal qualitative study from 1996 to 2004, we document the efforts made by the promoters of the market to alleviate these ambiguities and show how the size of resources needed results in the leadership of the most powerful. We thus provide a socially based explanation for the concentration and lack of transparency of the market. Our research exemplifies the contradictions between the rhetorical justification of financial innovations provided by financial theory and the empirical realities of a modern derivative market. It suggests that the actual structure of the market might best be understood by paying attention to the way different cognitive and political communities react to these contradictions.

Key Words: cognitive and political ambiguities • financial innovation • OTC markets • social construction of value • social studies of finance

Organization Studies, Vol. 30, No. 5, 549-575 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840609106113


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Socioecon RevHome page
G. Morgan
Legitimacy in financial markets: credit default swaps in the current crisis
Socioecon. Rev., November 8, 2009; (2009) mwp025v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]