This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rawls, A. W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Harold Garfinkel, Ethnomethodology and Workplace Studies

Bentley College, USA, arawls{at}bentley.edu

Known primarily as the author of a method for studying work, Harold Garfinkel — and ethnomethodological studies of work, or workplace studies — also offer an important alternative theory of work. First articulated in the late 1940s and early 1950s as a theory of communication, organization, and information, it has been Garfinkel's proposal that mutual understanding (orienting objects, meaning, and identities) in interactions, including technical situations of work, requires constant mutual orientation to situated constitutive expectancies — taken-for-granted methods of producing order that constitute sense — accompanied by displays of attention, competence, and trust. Based on this premise, researchers need to enter worksites to learn the order properties of work. Conventional theories, by contrast, treat social orders (including work) as resulting from individual interests, external constraint, and/or some conjunction between the two. For Garfinkel, however, individual motivation, power, and constraint must be managed by workers in and through the details of work. He insists that the need for participants to mutually orient ways of producing order on each next occasion adequately explains the details of order and sensemaking. Thus, any worksite exhibits the details required to produce, manage and understand local orders of work, including power and constraint — details that are local matters, lost to general formulation, requiring a research approach focused on the order properties of those details.

Key Words: Garfinkel • ethnomethodology • workplace studies • conversation analysis • social theory • work • practices • reflexivity • communication • globalization

Organization Studies, Vol. 29, No. 5, 701-732 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840608088768


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Nicolini Zooming In and Out: Studying Practices by Switching Theoretical Lenses and Trailing Connections Organization Studies, December 1, 2009; 30(12): 1391 - 1418. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. W. Rawls An Essay on Two Conceptions of Social Order: Constitutive Orders of Action, Objects and Identities vs Aggregated Orders of Individual Action Journal of Classical Sociology, November 1, 2009; 9(4): 500 - 520. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Hallett, B. Harger, and D. Eder Gossip at Work: Unsanctioned Evaluative Talk in Formal School Meetings Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, October 1, 2009; 38(5): 584 - 618. [Abstract] [PDF]