Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Samra-Fredericks, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bargiela-Chiappini, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Introduction to the Symposium on The Foundations of Organizing: The Contribution from Garfinkel, Goffman and Sacks

Dalvir Samra-Fredericks

Nottingham Trent University, UK, dalvir.samra-fredericks{at}ntu.ac.uk

Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini

Nottingham Trent University, UK, francesca.bargiela{at}ntu.ac.uk

This paper outlines a case for bringing the work of three scholars — Garfinkel (ethnomethodology), Goffman (interaction order/dramaturgy), Sacks (conversation analysis) — into the management and/or organization studies field. It specifically attends to the ways their work adds to understandings of the foundations of organizing. Further, we argue for studies of naturally occurring interaction in ways forged by these scholars and substantiate this move through touching on a number of domains of study where a contribution would be forthcoming, indicated here through the conceptual terrain of practice, identity, power and process theorizing. It is an endeavour which also problematizes the interview `method'. Crucially too, as part of this discussion, we not only summarize elements from these three scholars' legacies for our field, but also introduce the four papers selected for this Symposium Issue. We highlight the ways they take up particular threads and offer empirical illustrations of fine-grained studies of the foundations of organizing.

Key Words: conversation analysis • ethnomethodology • foundations • Garfinkel • Goffman • interaction order • management/organization studies • methods • organizing • practice • Sacks • social-moral order • work

Organization Studies, Vol. 29, No. 5, 653-675 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840608088763


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management LearningHome page
S. Fox
'This Interpreted World': Two Turns to the Social in Management Learning
Management Learning, September 1, 2009; 40(4): 371 - 378.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
S. Gherardi
Introduction: The Critical Power of the `Practice Lens'
Management Learning, April 1, 2009; 40(2): 115 - 128.
[PDF]