This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Symon, G. Articles by Cassell, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Positioning Qualitative Research as Resistance to the Institutionalization of the Academic Labour Process

Birkbeck, University of London, UK, g.symon{at}bbk.ac.uk

Anna Buehring

Manchester Metropolitan University Business School, UK, a.buehring{at}mmu.ac.uk

Phil Johnson

Sheffield University Management School, UK, phil.johnson{at}sheffield.ac.uk

Catherine Cassell

Manchester Business School, UK, Catherine.Cassell{at}mbs.ac.uk

The focus of this paper is on the `institutional work' (Lawrence and Suddaby 2006) of disrupting institutions, examining the rhetorical strategies employed to construct and justify meanings and interpretations. This work is explored in the context of the contemporary academic labour process; specifically, research approaches within the management discipline. A total of 45 individuals involved in funding, conducting, publishing and using qualitative management research were interviewed. From our analysis of their arguments, we focus specifically on the discursive positioning of quantitative research as illegitimate institutionalization of academic working practices and of qualitative research as legitimate resistance to this institutionalization. We identify a number of rhetorical strategies which construct and justify these discursive positions including: the undermining of success criteria; the legitimizing of interests (through claims of institutionalized discrimination) and actors (through identity claims); attributions of political action (including the construction of counter-institutions); claims to agency; and the invocation of alternative institutional logics. We argue that examining institutional work as rhetoric adds to our theoretical understanding of the discursive disruption of institutions, particularly with respect to the manipulation of contradictory meanings and the functions of agency—structure discourse; and contributes a political dimension to our understanding of the qualitative—quantitative `divide' within management research.

Key Words: academic labour process • qualitative research • institutional work • resistance • rhetoric

Organization Studies, Vol. 29, No. 10, 1315-1336 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840607086552


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Moldoveanu Why and how do theory groups get ahead in organization studies? Groundwork for a model of discursive moves Strategic Organization, August 1, 2009; 7(3): 235 - 276. [Abstract] [PDF]