Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Golant, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Sillince, J. A.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Constitution of Organizational Legitimacy: A Narrative Perspective

Benjamin D. Golant

Aston University, Birmingham, UK, bengolant{at}yahoo.co.uk

John A.A. Sillince

Aston University, Birmingham, UK, j.a.a.sillince{at}aston.ac.uk

This article recognizes a major dichotomy in the study of legitimacy construction at the organizational level. Scholars have either focused on agent-centred explanations of organizational legitimation, which favour its evaluative dimension, or on structural explanations, which highlight the isomorphic pressures imposed on individual organizations in order to become and remain intelligible to stakeholders. By applying a discursive methodology, we propose a new approach for the study of organizational legitimacy construction that incorporates both its evaluative and cognitive dimensions. Drawing on a structurational model of narrative recursivity, inspired by Greimas (1987), we argue that the construction of organizational legitimacy is dependent on both the persuasiveness of organizational storytelling and on the realization of a taken-for-granted narrative structure. We explicate the processes by which legitimacy is narratively constructed through empirical data associated with the founding of an HIV/AIDS organization.

Key Words: legitimacy • narrative • social construction • structuration

Organization Studies, Vol. 28, No. 8, 1149-1167 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840607075671


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
J. A.A. Sillince and A. D. Brown
Multiple organizational identities and legitimacy: The rhetoric of police websites
Human Relations, December 1, 2009; 62(12): 1829 - 1856.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
D. Geiger and E. Antonacopoulou
Narratives and Organizational Dynamics: Exploring Blind Spots and Organizational Inertia
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, September 1, 2009; 45(3): 411 - 436.
[Abstract] [PDF]