Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levy, D.
Right arrow Articles by Scully, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Institutional Entrepreneur as Modern Prince: The Strategic Face of Power in Contested Fields

David Levy

University of Massachusetts, Boston, USA, david.levy{at}umb.edu

Maureen Scully

University of Massachusetts, Boston, USA, maureen.scully{at}umb.edu

This paper develops a theoretical framework that situates institutional entrepreneurship by drawing from Gramsci's concept of hegemony to understand the contingent stabilization of organizational fields, and by employing his discussion of the Modern Prince as the collective agent who organizes and strategizes counter-hegemonic challenges. Our framework makes three contributions. First, we characterize the interlaced material, discursive, and organizational dimensions of field structure. Second, we argue that strategy must be examined more rigorously as the mode of action by which institutional entrepreneurs engage with field structures. Third, we argue that institutional entrepreneurship, in challenging the position of incumbent actors and stable fields, reveals a `strategic face of power', particularly useful for understanding the political nature of contestation in issue-based fields.

Key Words: institutional entrepreneurship • strategy • hegemony

Organization Studies, Vol. 28, No. 7, 971-991 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840607078109
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 European Journal of Social TheoryHome page
F. Avelino and J. Rotmans
Power in Transition: An Interdisciplinary Framework to Study Power in Relation to Structural Change
European Journal of Social Theory, November 1, 2009; 12(4): 543 - 569.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Marketing TheoryHome page
S. Bohm and V. Brei
Marketing the hegemony of development: of pulp fictions and green deserts
Marketing Theory, December 1, 2008; 8(4): 339 - 366.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organization StudiesHome page
A. Spicer and S. Bohm
Moving Management: Theorizing Struggles against the Hegemony of Management
Organization Studies, November 1, 2007; 28(11): 1667 - 1698.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organization StudiesHome page
R. Garud, C. Hardy, and S. Maguire
Institutional Entrepreneurship as Embedded Agency: An Introduction to the Special Issue
Organization Studies, July 1, 2007; 28(7): 957 - 969.
[PDF]