Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vermeulen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Greenwood, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Impact of Governmental Policies in Institutional Fields: The Case of Innovation in the Dutch Concrete Industry

Patrick Vermeulen

Tilburg University, the Netherlands

Rutger Büch

Van de Geijn Partners bv, the Netherlands

Royston Greenwood

University of Alberta, Canada

Patrick Vermeulen

Tilburg University, the Netherlands

Rutger Büch

Van de Geijn Partners bv, the Netherlands

Royston Greenwood

University of Alberta, Canada

The creation of markets for new products involves interplay between various field constituents. A major challenge in this process is to establish a sufficient level of legitimacy in order for a market to become accepted in the organization field. Yet, this process of market creation may be suppressed by established institutional arrangements that actively block the diffusion of innovations and constrain change. In this paper, we examine the roles of regulatory structures, professional associations and competitors in market suppression. We pay particular attention to the actions and circumstances preventing change in a mature sector of the economy, despite state policies directed at change. Active resistance from professional associations and corporate actors inhibited creation of a new market. We draw upon institutional theory to provide an account of the different communities of interest involved in an institutional field, exploring how they are developed and negotiated. We argue that the role of the government and the impact of its policies in market construction may be overemphasized and that the complexity of its interaction with organizational fields may be underestimated.

Key Words: organizational fields • market creation • governmental policy • strong ties

Organization Studies, Vol. 28, No. 4, 515-540 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840606067927


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
K. Lamertz and P. P. M. A. R. Heugens
Institutional Translation through Spectatorship: Collective Consumption and Editing of Symbolic Organizational Texts by Firms and their Audiences
Organization Studies, November 1, 2009; 30(11): 1249 - 1279.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
S. Ozen and H. Ozen
Peasants Against MNCs and the State: The Role of the Bergama Struggle in the Institutional Construction of the Gold-Mining Field in Turkey
Organization, July 1, 2009; 16(4): 547 - 573.
[Abstract] [PDF]