This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0170840606067994v1 28/2/197    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Seidl, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

General Strategy Concepts and the Ecology of Strategy Discourses: A Systemic-Discursive Perspective

University of Munich, Germany

Drawing on Wittgenstein, Lyotard and Luhmann the article develops a systemic-discursive perspective on the field of strategy and the respective role of general strategy concepts. The perspective suggests that the field of strategy should not be conceptualized as a unified field but rather as fragmented into a multitude of autonomous discourses. Owing to their autonomy, no transfer of strategy concepts across different discourses is possible. Instead, every single strategy discourse can merely construct its own discourse-specific concepts. Different discourses, however, draw on the same strategy labels, which leads to ‘productive misunderstandings’ (Teubner). On the basis of the particular perspective advanced here, the entire field of strategy is re-described as an ecology of strategy discourses.

Key Words: discourse • language game • social-systems theory • strategy as practice • strategy concepts

This version was published on February 1, 2007

Organization Studies, Vol. 28, No. 2, 197-218 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840606067994


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Palli, E. Vaara, and V. Sorsa Strategy as text and discursive practice: a genre-based approach to strategizing in city administration Discourse & Communication, August 1, 2009; 3(3): 303 - 318. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. P. Spee and P. Jarzabkowski Strategy tools as boundary objects Strategic Organization, May 1, 2009; 7(2): 223 - 232. [PDF]

				D. Geiger Revisiting the Concept of Practice: Toward an Argumentative Understanding of Practicing Management Learning, April 1, 2009; 40(2): 129 - 144. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Jarzabkowski and D. Seidl The Role of Meetings in the Social Practice of Strategy Organization Studies, November 1, 2008; 29(11): 1391 - 1426. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Regner Strategy-as-practice and dynamic capabilities: Steps towards a dynamic view of strategy Human Relations, April 1, 2008; 61(4): 565 - 588. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Seidl Standard Setting and Following in Corporate Governance: An Observation-Theoretical Study of the Effectiveness of Governance Codes Organization, September 1, 2007; 14(5): 705 - 727. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Jarzabkowski, J. Balogun, and D. Seidl Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective Human Relations, January 1, 2007; 60(1): 5 - 27. [Abstract] [PDF]