Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on the Handbook of Organizational and Managerial Wisdom

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armbrüster, T.
Right arrow Articles by Glückler, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Organizational Change and the Economics of Management Consulting: A Response to Sorge and van Witteloostuijn

Thomas Armbrüster

Witten/Herdecke University, Germany, thomas.armbruester{at}uni-wh.de

Johannes Glückler

Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Germany, johannes.glueckler{at}ku-eichstaett.de

This essay responds to Sorge and van Witteloostuijn (2004) and argues that consulting firms play an important economic role in helping organizations trigger and deal with change. Sorge and van Witteloostuijn claim that management consultancy is a business in which clients buy into hype-driven and unsubstantiated advice, and they imply that consultants yield returns from short-term opportunism based on information asymmetries. We propose that clients have several sources for assessing consulting service quality, and word-of-mouth effects discourage short-term opportunism of consultants. We also question Sorge and van Witteloostuijn's view that the need for organizations to change is largely a myth. We present data on economic changes over the last three decades to which firms had to respond and continue to do so. Accordingly, we argue that the continuing demand for consultancy is genuine, rather than induced by hype.

Key Words: Management consulting • professional service firms • service economics • consulting-academia cooperation • rigour vs. relevance

Organization Studies, Vol. 28, No. 12, 1873-1885 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840607082221


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
A. Sorge and A. van Witteloostuijn
The (Non)sense of Organizational Change Continued: A Rejoinder to Armbruster and Gluckler
Organization Studies, December 1, 2007; 28(12): 1887 - 1892.
[Abstract] [PDF]