Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harding, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

On Lacan and the `Becoming-ness' of Organizations/Selves

Nancy Harding

University of Bradford School of Management, UK, N.H.Harding{at}Bradford.ac.uk

Poststructuralist accounts of organizations understand them as flows, as verbs in process of always-becoming. Subjects who work `in' organizations are similarly always in a process of becoming. Organization and members are mutually constitutive, each enfolded within the other. The process by which each is enfolded within and constituted by the other is what is explored in this essai. Its aim is to analyse something of the becoming-ness of organizations/selves, in which the researcher-self is imbricated in this becoming-ness and must therefore be part of that which is studied. To achieve this aim I draw on Lacan's concepts: of the mirror stage, or how I am in an agonistic relationship with the other; Nachträglichkeit or the reliving of the past in the present (deferred action); and identification. I apply these concepts to an interview I, an academic, carried out with a manager, emphasizing the importance of these organizational identities in our encounter with each other. The conclusion I reach is that the organization I am `in' is at the same time `in' me: there is no inside and no outside.

Organization Studies, Vol. 28, No. 11, 1761-1773 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840607082225


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
OrganizationHome page
M. Driver
Encountering the Arugula Leaf: The Failure of the Imaginary and its Implications for Research on Identity in Organizations
Organization, July 1, 2009; 16(4): 487 - 504.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
M. Driver
From Loss to Lack: Stories of Organizational Change as Encounters with Failed Fantasies of Self, Work and Organization
Organization, May 1, 2009; 16(3): 353 - 369.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
J. Costas and P. Fleming
Beyond dis-identification: A discursive approach to self-alienation in contemporary organizations
Human Relations, March 1, 2009; 62(3): 353 - 378.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
A. Styhre
Management Control in Bureaucratic and Postbureaucratic Organizations: A Lacanian Perspective
Group Organization Management, December 1, 2008; 33(6): 635 - 656.
[Abstract] [PDF]