Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whittington, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Strategy Practice and Strategy Process: Family Differences and the Sociological Eye

Richard Whittington

University of Oxford, UK, Richard.whittington{at}sbs.ox.ac.uk

This Essai argues for the distinctive position of Strategy-as-Practice research outside the immediate family of Strategy Process. Strategy-as-Practice's fascination with the phenomenon of strategy itself takes it beyond traditional Process perspectives. Relying on the `sociological eye', Strategy-as-Practice treats strategy like any other practice in society, capable of being studied from many different angles. Under the four themes of praxis, practices, practitioners and the profession of strategy as an institutional field, the Essai demonstrates the potential range of research topics, performance notions and methodologies within Strategy-as-Practice. It concludes by proposing five implications of the sociological eye for the conduct of Strategy-as-Practice research, highlighting particularly social connections and relationships, embeddedness, irony, problematized notions of performance and a respect for continuity.

Key Words: practice • process • sociology • strategy

Organization Studies, Vol. 28, No. 10, 1575-1586 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840607081557


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management LearningHome page
D. Geiger
Revisiting the Concept of Practice: Toward an Argumentative Understanding of Practicing
Management Learning, April 1, 2009; 40(2): 129 - 144.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
H. Tsoukas
Thank You and Goodbye! Reflections of a Departing Editor-in-Chief
Organization Studies, August 1, 2008; 29(8-9): 1085 - 1107.
[PDF]


Home page
Strategic OrganizationHome page
P. Jarzabkowski and R. Whittington
Hard to disagree, mostly
Strategic Organization, February 1, 2008; 6(1): 101 - 106.
[PDF]


Home page
Strategic OrganizationHome page
C. Carter, S. R. Clegg, and M. Kornberger
S-A-P zapping the field
Strategic Organization, February 1, 2008; 6(1): 107 - 112.
[PDF]