This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0170840607077861v1 28/10/1503    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Zhu, Z. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Reform without a Theory: Why Does it Work in China?

University of Hull Business School, UK, z.zhu{at}hull.ac.uk

The gradualism—radicalism debate on China's reform is misleading. The reform can alternatively be seen as one without a theory. The question is why a no-theory `strategy' was `selected' by the Chinese elite, `accepted' by the Chinese people and `worked' in the Chinese context. An investigation based on a Confucian conceptual framework suggests that reform-without-a-theory was facilitated by a set of historically specific structural factors, factors full of complementarities and tensions that skilled actors were able to exploit to pursue sectional interests. The implications of China's reform for organization studies are explored along three interrelated lines: structural plurality and strategic change, structural transformation and differential agency, and situated entrepreneurship and unintended consequences.

Key Words: China • reform • strategy • structure • agency • WSR

This version was published on October 1, 2007

Organization Studies, Vol. 28, No. 10, 1503-1522 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840607077861


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?