This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0170840606064104v1 27/8/1111    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Iedema, R. Articles by Scheeres, H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Surveillance, Resistance, Observance: Exploring the Teleo-affective Volatility of Workplace Interaction

The University of New South Wales, Australia

Carl Rhodes

Hermine Scheeres

University of Technology Sydney, Australia

Central to the critical study of contemporary management practice has been an understanding of the possibilities for worker subjugation framed in terms of the disciplinary practices of surveillance and responses to it in terms of compliance and resistance. In this paper, we explore how the volatility of everyday interaction also leads to a different response — one we call ‘observance’. We introduce this term to refer to the process of identity diversification at work, and to create an analytical-conceptual space that is not fully circumscribed by compliance and resistance. To give the concept of observance empirical flesh, we present an account of team meetings held as part of a quality improvement programme in a manufacturing workplace in Sydney, Australia. We use this account to show how the interpersonal dynamics among team workers led to ‘emergent’ subject positions and conducts. Capturing the effects of the volatility of everyday workplace interaction, the concept of observance is shown to account for such emergent positioning and reflexivity. Observance enables us to highlight this and also how people exceed the parameters of surveillance, compliance and resistance, especially in relation to participativecommunicative or ‘immaterial’ forms of work.

Key Words: surveillance • resistance • observance • identity • immaterial labour • situated interaction • teleo-affectivity

This version was published on August 1, 2006

Organization Studies, Vol. 27, No. 8, 1111-1130 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840606064104


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Sims, C. Huxham, and N. Beech On Telling Stories But Hearing Snippets: Sense-taking from Presentations of Practice Organization, May 1, 2009; 16(3): 371 - 388. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Ainsworth, D. Grant, and R. Iedema `Keeping things moving': space and the construction of middle management identity in a post-NPM organization Discourse & Communication, February 1, 2009; 3(1): 5 - 25. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Pullen and C. Rhodes `It's All About Me!': Gendered Narcissism and Leaders' Identity Work Leadership, February 1, 2008; 4(1): 5 - 25. [Abstract] [PDF]