This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0170840606064086v1 27/6/855    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Frenkel, M. Articles by Shenhav, Y. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

From Binarism Back to Hybridity: A Postcolonial Reading of Management and Organization Studies

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel

Yehouda Shenhav

Tel Aviv University, Israel

Drawing on recent theoretical developments in postcolonial research, we examine the effect of the colonial encounter on the canonization of management and organization studies (MOS) as well as the field’s epistemological boundaries. In contrast to Orientalism, which is founded on a neat, binary, division between West and East, we offer (following Latour) a hybrid epistemology, which recognizes that the history of management and organizations should include the fusion between the colonizer and the colonized and their mutual effects on each other. Thus, while we discern the Orientalist assumptions embedded in the writing of management scholars, we also show that certain texts and practices that emerged during the colonial, as well as neo-colonial, encounter were excluded from the field, resulting in a ‘purified canon’. We conclude by arguing that hybridization between the metropole and colonies, and between western and non-western organizational entities, needs to be acknowledged by students of cultural diversity, and of critical management.

Key Words: postcolonialism • Orientalism • hybridity • purification • imperial bureaucracy • culture • management and organization studies • critical management studies

This version was published on June 1, 2006

Organization Studies, Vol. 27, No. 6, 855-876 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840606064086


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Ruef and A. Harness Agrarian Origins of Management Ideology: The Roman and Antebellum Cases Organization Studies, June 1, 2009; 30(6): 589 - 607. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Riad Organization's Engagements with Ancient Egypt: Framing and Claiming the Sublime? Organization, July 1, 2008; 15(4): 475 - 512. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Hamlett, A. R. Bailey, A. Alexander, and G. Shaw Ethnicity and Consumption: South Asian food shopping patterns in Britain, 1947--75 1 Journal of Consumer Culture, March 1, 2008; 8(1): 91 - 116. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. J. Broadfoot and D. Munshi Diverse Voices and Alternative Rationalities: Imagining Forms of Postcolonial Organizational Communication Management Communication Quarterly, November 1, 2007; 21(2): 249 - 267. [PDF]