This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Chia, R. Articles by Holt, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Strategy as Practical Coping: A Heideggerian Perspective

University of Aberdeen Business School, UK

Robin Holt

Leeds University Business School, UK

What strategic actors actually do in practice has become increasingly the focus of strategy research in recent years. This paper argues that, in furthering such practice-based views of strategy, we need a more adequate re-conceptualization of agency, action and practice and how they interrelate. We draw from the work of the continental philosopher Martin Heidegger to articulate a relational theory of human agency that is better suited to explaining everyday purposive actions and practices. Specifically, we argue that the dominant ‘building’ mode of strategizing that configures actors (whether individual or organizational) as distinct entities deliberately engaging in purposeful strategic activities derives from a more basic ‘dwelling’ mode in which strategy emerges non-deliberately through everyday practical coping. Whereas, from the building perspective, strategy is predicated upon the prior conception of plans that are then orchestrated to realize desired outcome, from a dwelling perspective strategy does not require, nor does it presuppose, intention and purposeful goal-orientation: strategic ‘intent’ is viewed as immanent in every adaptive action. Observed consistencies in actions taken are explained not through deliberate goal-orientation but, instead, via a modus operandi: an internalized disposition to act in a manner congruent with past actions and experiences. Explaining strategy in dwelling terms enables us to understand how it is that actions may be consistent and organizationally effective without (and even in spite of) the existence of purposeful strategic plans.

Key Words: habitus • practice • building • dwelling • equipmentality • availableness

Organization Studies, Vol. 27, No. 5, 635-655 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840606064102


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Gherardi Introduction: The Critical Power of the `Practice Lens' Management Learning, April 1, 2009; 40(2): 115 - 128. [PDF]

				B. Carroll, L. Levy, and D. Richmond Leadership as Practice: Challenging the Competency Paradigm Leadership, November 1, 2008; 4(4): 363 - 379. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Pajunen The Nature of Organizational Mechanisms Organization Studies, November 1, 2008; 29(11): 1449 - 1468. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Regner Strategy-as-practice and dynamic capabilities: Steps towards a dynamic view of strategy Human Relations, April 1, 2008; 61(4): 565 - 588. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Chia and R. Holt On Managerial Knowledge Management Learning, April 1, 2008; 39(2): 141 - 158. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Lounsbury and E. T. Crumley New Practice Creation: An Institutional Perspective on Innovation Organization Studies, July 1, 2007; 28(7): 993 - 1012. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Vaara Book Review: On New Directions in Strategy-as-Practice Literature Organization, March 1, 2007; 14(2): 303 - 306. [PDF]

				R. Chia and B. MacKay Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: Discovering strategy in the logic of practice Human Relations, January 1, 2007; 60(1): 217 - 242. [Abstract] [PDF]