Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Contu, A.
Right arrow Articles by Willmott, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Studying Practice: Situating Talking About Machines

Alessia Contu

Lancaster University, UK

Hugh Willmott

Cardiff Business School, UK

Julian Orr’s Talking About Machines (TAM) is celebrated for communicating something of the richness and complexity of work practices. Our endeavour is to connect the current wave of interest in practice with Orr’s focal attentiveness to the practices of photocopier-repair technicians. More specifically, we revisit how, in TAM, a careful examination of work practice is commended by Orr as a way of ‘deepen[ing] our under-standings’—for example, about ‘the relations of employment and the role of work in the constitution of workers’ identity’. This central theme of TAM, we contend, provides illuminating insights into, and poses interesting questions for students of, the politics of work organization. The novelty of our reading of TAM stems from a mobilization of some Marxist and Lacanian ideas, as developed in theorizations of hegemony, that enable us to problematize both the self-identification of the technicians as heroic, and the distancing of their practices from the corporation’s bureaucratic prescriptions. Our particular interest lies in unpicking the politico-economic significance of the technicians’ practices; and, more specifically, their relevance for understanding the reproduction of capitalist work relations.

Key Words: social practice • ideological fantasy • identification • community of practice • Zizek

Organization Studies, Vol. 27, No. 12, 1769-1782 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840606071895


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
T. Kuhn and M. H. Jackson
Accomplishing Knowledge: A Framework for Investigating Knowing in Organizations
Management Communication Quarterly, May 1, 2008; 21(4): 454 - 485.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
A. Contu
Decaf Resistance: On Misbehavior, Cynicism, and Desire in Liberal Workplaces
Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 2008; 21(3): 364 - 379.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
N. Harding
On Lacan and the `Becoming-ness' of Organizations/Selves
Organization Studies, November 1, 2007; 28(11): 1761 - 1773.
[Abstract] [PDF]