This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Vlaar, P. W.L. Articles by Volberda, H. W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Coping with Problems of Understanding in Interorganizational Relationships: Using Formalization as a Means to Make Sense

RSM Erasmus University, The Netherlands

Frans A.J. Van den Bosch

RSM Erasmus University, The Netherlands

Henk W. Volberda

RSM Erasmus University, The Netherlands

Research into the management of interorganizational relationships has hitherto primarily focused on problems of coordination, control, and to a lesser extent, legitimacy. In this article, we assert that partners cooperating in such relationships are also confronted with ‘problems of understanding’. Such problems arise from differences between partners in terms of culture, experience, structure and industry, and from the uncertainty and ambiguity that participants in interorganizational relationships experience in early stages of collaboration. Building on Karl Weick’s theory of sensemaking, we advance that participants in interorganizational relationships use formalization as a means to make sense of their partners, the interorganizational relationships in which they are engaged and the contexts in which these are embedded so as to diminish problems of understanding. We offer a systematic overview of the mechanisms through which formalization facilitates sensemaking, including: (1) focusing participants’ attention; (2) provoking articulation, deliberation and reflection; (3) instigating and maintaining interaction; and (4) reducing judgement errors and individual biases, and diminishing the incompleteness and inconsistency of cognitive representations. In this way, the article contributes to a better understanding of the relationships between formalization and sensemaking in collaborative relationships, and it carries Karl Weick’s thinking on the relationship between sense-making and organizing forward in the context of interorganizational management.

Key Words: formalization • sensemaking • understanding • interorganizational cooperation

Organization Studies, Vol. 27, No. 11, 1617-1638 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840606068338


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Resteigne and J. Soeters Managing Militarily Armed Forces & Society, January 1, 2009; 35(2): 307 - 332. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. W. L. Vlaar, F. A. J. Van Den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda Towards a Dialectic Perspective on Formalization in Interorganizational Relationships: How Alliance Managers Capitalize on the Duality Inherent in Contracts, Rules and Procedures Organization Studies, April 1, 2007; 28(4): 437 - 466. [Abstract] [PDF]