This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (19) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Dreyfus, H. L. Articles by Dreyfus, S. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Peripheral Vision

Expertise in Real World Contexts

University of California, Berkeley, USA, dreyfus{at}cogsci.berkeley.edu

Stuart E. Dreyfus

University of California, Berkeley, USA, dreyfus{at}ieor.berkeley.edu

In this paper we describe a five-stage phenomenological model of skill acquisition, of which expertise is the highest stage. Contrary to the claims of knowledge engineers, we argue that expertise in general, and medical expertise in particular, cannot be captured in rule-based expert systems, since expertise is based on the making of immediate, unreflective situational responses; intuitive judgment is the hallmark of expertise. Deliberation is certainly used by experts, if time permits, but it is done for the purpose of improving intuition, not replacing it. The best way to avoid mistakes is to take responsibility for them when they occur, rather than try to prevent them by foolproof rules. In bureaucratic societies, however, there is the danger that expertise may be diminished through over-reliance on calculative rationality.

Key Words: skills • expertise • rules • knowledge engineering • rationality • intuition

Organization Studies, Vol. 26, No. 5, 779-792 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840605053102


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Yanow Ways of Knowing: Passionate Humility and Reflective Practice in Research and Management The American Review of Public Administration, December 1, 2009; 39(6): 579 - 601. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Dodgson and S. Mccall From novice to expert: an investigation into the professional development of Rehabilitation Workers through a study of practice in technical rehabilitation interventions British Journal of Visual Impairment, May 1, 2009; 27(2): 159 - 172. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Sims, C. Huxham, and N. Beech On Telling Stories But Hearing Snippets: Sense-taking from Presentations of Practice Organization, May 1, 2009; 16(3): 371 - 388. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Sadler-Smith and L. A. Burke Fostering Intuition in Management Education: Activities and Resources Journal of Management Education, April 1, 2009; 33(2): 239 - 262. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Kai-Wah Chu and N. Law The development of information search expertise of research students Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, September 1, 2008; 40(3): 165 - 177. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. G. McCracken and J. C. Marsh Practitioner Expertise in Evidence-Based Practice Decision Making Research on Social Work Practice, July 1, 2008; 18(4): 301 - 310. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. D. Miller Simon and Polanyi on Rationality and Knowledge Organization Studies, July 1, 2008; 29(7): 933 - 955. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Ewenstein and J. Whyte Beyond Words: Aesthetic Knowledge and Knowing in Organizations Organization Studies, May 1, 2007; 28(5): 689 - 708. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Chia and B. MacKay Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: Discovering strategy in the logic of practice Human Relations, January 1, 2007; 60(1): 217 - 242. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Yanow Talking about Practices: On Julian Orr's Talking About Machines Organization Studies, December 1, 2006; 27(12): 1743 - 1756. [Abstract] [PDF]