Organization Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brusoni, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Organization Studies, Vol. 26, No. 12, 1885-1907 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840605059161
© 2005 SAGE Publications

The Limits to Specialization: Problem Solving and Coordination in ‘Modular Networks’

Stefano Brusoni

Bocconi University (CESPRI & CRORA) and Silvio Tronchetti-Provera Foundation, Italy

This paper builds upon current research into the organizational implications of ‘modularity’. Advocates of modularity argue that the ‘invisible hand’ of markets is reaching activities previously controlled through the visible hand of hierarchies. This paper argues that there are cognitive limits to the extent of division of labour: what kinds of problems firms solve, and how they solve them, set limits to the extent of division of labour, irrespective of the extent of the market. This paper analyses the cognitive limits to the division of labour, relying on an in-depth case study of engineering design activities. On this basis, it explains why coordinating increasingly specialized bodies of knowledge, and increasingly distributed learning processes, requires the presence of knowledge-integrating firms even in the presence of modular products. Such firms, relying on their wide in-house scientific and technological capabilities, have the ‘authority’ to identify, propose and implement solutions to complex problems. In so doing, they coordinate networks of suppliers of both components and specialized competencies.

Key Words: modularity • problem solving • innovation • analysis • synthesis • engineering design


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Socioecon RevHome page
J. Whitford and C. Potter
Regional economies, open networks and the spatial fragmentation of production
Socioecon. Rev., July 1, 2007; 5(3): 497 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
R. N. Langlois
The Secret Life of Mundane Transaction Costs
Organization Studies, September 1, 2006; 27(9): 1389 - 1410.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
M.-L. Djelic, B. Nooteboom, and R. Whitley
Introduction: Dynamics of Interaction between Institutions, Markets and Organizations
Organization Studies, December 1, 2005; 26(12): 1733 - 1741.
[PDF]