Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Peripheral Vision

Relationality

Robert Cooper

Keele University, UK

The act of relating is analysed as a constitutive feature of human agency. Relating is viewed as the continuous work of connecting and disconnecting in a fluctuating network of existential events. Relating re-lates the human world as a restless scene of flowing parts in which whole, self-contained objects take second place to the continuous transmission of movement. The relating of the world of moving parts is illustrated through the examples of modern methods of mass production and the transmission of information which both produce a 'weakening of reality'.

Key Words: human agency • information transmission • the latent • part–whole relationship • production–prediction

Organization Studies, Vol. 26, No. 11, 1689-1710 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840605056398


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
K. D. Miller
Organizational Risk after Modernism
Organization Studies, February 1, 2009; 30(2-3): 157 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
LeadershipHome page
B. Carroll, L. Levy, and D. Richmond
Leadership as Practice: Challenging the Competency Paradigm
Leadership, November 1, 2008; 4(4): 363 - 379.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
LeadershipHome page
W. Kupers and J. Weibler
Inter-leadership: Why and How Should We Think of Leadership and Followership Integrally?
Leadership, November 1, 2008; 4(4): 443 - 475.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
R. Chia and R. Holt
On Managerial Knowledge
Management Learning, April 1, 2008; 39(2): 141 - 158.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
O. Belova, I. King, and M. Sliwa
Introduction: Polyphony and Organization Studies: Mikhail Bakhtin and Beyond
Organization Studies, April 1, 2008; 29(4): 493 - 500.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Planning TheoryHome page
J. Hillier
Plan(e) Speaking: a Multiplanar Theory of Spatial Planning
Planning Theory, March 1, 2008; 7(1): 24 - 50.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
A. Nayak
On the Way to Theory: A Processual Approach
Organization Studies, February 1, 2008; 29(2): 173 - 190.
[Abstract] [PDF]