Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Starbuck, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Vita Contemplativa

Why I Stopped Trying to Understand the Real World

William H. Starbuck

New York University, USA

Years ago, I believed that rationality could manufacture understanding. I lived in physical and social environments that were real and I wanted to understand the social realities. I wanted to create a genuine ‘behavioral science’ based on mathematical models, computer simulation, and systematic experiments. Various experiences over the years have challenged these beliefs. I discovered that rationality can not only be a deceptive tool but a potentially dangerous one, and I learned a few techniques to help me challenge my rational thought. I discovered that research .ndings have very low reliabilities, that some .elds make no discernible progress over many decades, and that societal cultures strongly in.uence researchers’ judgments about what constitutes useful knowledge. I saw that much that passes for research is merely random noise dressed up in pretentious language. Rather than realities, the social systems I was studying proved to be arbitrary categories created by observers or social conventions. I became an advocate for research that actively attempts to change situations rather than merely to observe what happens spontaneously.

Key Words: research • methodology • social construction • hypothesis tests • rationality

Organization Studies, Vol. 25, No. 7, 1233-1254 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840604046361


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management LearningHome page
R. Thorpe
Introduction: Constructionist Approaches to Management Research
Management Learning, April 1, 2008; 39(2): 115 - 121.
[PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
C. Yip
Review Section: The Production of Knowledge: The Challenge of Social Science Research WILLIAM H. STARBUCK. New York: Oxford University Press Inc., 2006. 194 pp. ISBN 0199288534
Management Learning, July 1, 2007; 38(3): 367 - 371.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management EducationHome page
J. M. Bartunek
Beginning Your Vita Contemplativa
Journal of Management Education, June 1, 2007; 31(3): 413 - 420.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing TheoryHome page
M. Tadajewski
The ordering of marketing theory: the influence of McCarthyism and the Cold War
Marketing Theory, June 1, 2006; 6(2): 163 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]