Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Llewellyn, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

In Search of Modernization: The Negotiation of Social Identity in Organizational Reform

Nick Llewellyn

Warwick Business School, UK, nick.llewellyn{at}wbs.ac.uk

Based on the analysis of two short documents, this article considers how social categories, such as bureaucracy, council, business, and so on, are utilized in descriptions of project work. Specifically, it examines the locally occasioned interpretative practices that enabled a single project (in a UK local authority) to be described as modernizing the way services were delivered. In part, this involved negotiating the category ‘bureaucratic’, with the author often reasoning it would be somehow misleading to use such a category to describe the project. The article focuses on the negotiation of social categories and on the work done to present aspects of the project as ‘documents’ (Garfinkel 1967) of the authority’s category membership, as ‘in keeping’ with what would be expected of such a type. Categorization, the act of tying specific events to social types or categories, is shown to be a significant resource in accounting for the character of project work. The article adds to debates on organizational identity and public-sector reform by examining members’ commonsense knowledge of various social categories and by illustrating the role of categorization in shaping how various organizational phenomena are understood.

Key Words: membership categorization analysis • UK local government • organizational identity • public-sector reform

Organization Studies, Vol. 25, No. 6, 947-968 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840604040677


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
R. E. Meyer and G. Hammerschmid
Changing Institutional Logics and Executive Identities: A Managerial Challenge to Public Administration in Austria
American Behavioral Scientist, March 1, 2006; 49(7): 1000 - 1014.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Policy and AdministrationHome page
R. Meyer and G. Hammerschmid
Public Management Reform: An Identity Project
Public Policy and Administration, January 1, 2006; 21(1): 99 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]