Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vera, D.
Right arrow Articles by Crossan, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Theatrical Improvisation: Lessons for Organizations

Dusya Vera

University of Houston, USA

Mary Crossan

University of Western Ontario, Canada

This article uses the improvisational theatre metaphor to examine the performance implications of improvisational processes in firms. We recognize similarities and differences between the concepts of performance and success in both theatre and organizations, and extract three main lessons from improvisational theatre that can be applied to organizational improvisation. In the first lesson, we start by recognizing the equivocal and unpredictable nature of improvisation. The second lesson emphasizes that good improvisational theatre arises because its main focus, in contrast to the focus of firms, is more on the process of improvising and less on the outcomes of improvisation. Lastly, in the third lesson, we look at the theatre techniques of ‘agreement’, ‘awareness’, ‘use of ready-mades’, and ‘collaboration’, and translate them into concepts that are relevant for organizations in developing an improvisational capability.

Key Words: theatre metaphor • improvisational theatre • organizational improvisation • performance • creativity • spontaneity

Organization Studies, Vol. 25, No. 5, 727-749 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840604042412
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Management EducationHome page
A. Kachra and K. Schnietz
The Capstone Strategy Course: What Might Real Integration Look Like?
Journal of Management Education, August 1, 2008; 32(4): 476 - 508.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
A. Aylesworth
Improving Case Discussion With an Improv Mind-Set
Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2008; 30(2): 106 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organization StudiesHome page
J. Hindmarsh and A. Pilnick
Knowing Bodies at Work: Embodiment and Ephemeral Teamwork in Anaesthesia
Organization Studies, September 1, 2007; 28(9): 1395 - 1416.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organization StudiesHome page
M. Stein
Toxicity and the Unconscious Experience of the Body at the Employee--Customer Interface
Organization Studies, August 1, 2007; 28(8): 1223 - 1241.
[Abstract] [PDF]