Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Toms, S.
Right arrow Articles by Filatotchev, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Corporate Governance, Business Strategy, and the Dynamics of Networks: a Theoretical Model and Application to the British Cotton Industry, 1830–1980

Steve Toms

University of York, UK st27{at}york.ac.uk

Igor Filatotchev

King’s College London, UK igor.filatotchev{at}kcl.ac.uk

This article develops a theoretical model to explain the variation of network structures and network dynamics according to industry and firm resource characteristics and the extent of resource dependency. It incorporates an accountability and corporate governance dimension and thereby seeks to explain the long-run processes of industrial and corporate change. To verify the theoretical framework, the article examines the long-run evolution of network structures in the British cotton industry. It shows how this industry developed network structures as part of the process of industrialization and then goes on to explain how these structures prevented flexible and timely responses to the later challenges of restructuring and re-equipping. The article also shows that the application of the theoretical model offers an opportunity to reinterpret the history of this archetypal industry.

Key Words: strategy • networks • governance • Lancashire cotton textiles

Organization Studies, Vol. 25, No. 4, 629-651 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840604040678


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Accounting HistoryHome page
K. W. Kininmonth and S. McKinstry
Stitching it up: accounting and financial control at J & P Coats Ltd, c1890 1960
Accounting History, November 1, 2007; 12(4): 367 - 391.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ENTERPRISE SOCHome page
P. Ollerenshaw
Innovation and Corporate Failure: Cyril Lord in U.K. Textiles, 1945-1968
Enterprise Soc., December 1, 2006; 7(4): 777 - 811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cambridge J EconHome page
H. van Ees and R. Bachmann
Transition economies and trust building: a network perspective on EU enlargement
Camb. J. Econ., November 1, 2006; 30(6): 923 - 939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]