This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Camisón-Zornoza, C. Articles by Boronat-Navarro, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Meta-analysis of Innovation and Organizational Size

Jaume I University, Castellón, Spain camison{at}emp.uji.es

Rafael Lapiedra-Alcamí

Jaume I University, Castellón, Spain lapiedra{at}emp.uji.es

Mercedes Segarra-Ciprés

Jaume I University, Castellón, Spain msegarra{at}emp.uji.es

Montserrat Boronat-Navarro

Jaume I University, Castellón, Spain mboronat{at}emp.uji.es

Findings regarding the direction and intensity of the relation between size and innovation in the literature are contradictory. In the journal Organization Studies in 1992, Damanpour proposed a meta-analytical study in an attempt to clarify the diversity of existing conclusions. The present article is a replica and an extension of that study using the same methodology. Our aim is to (1) bring the pool of accumulated knowledge up to date, examining the time span 1970–2001, and (2) review in greater depth the effects of alternative ways of measuring organizational size. The sample used was made up of 87 correlations drawn from 53 empirical studies published in the most important journals on business administration. The analysis enabled us to confirm the existence of a significant and positive correlation between size and innovation. It also provided evidence showing that the contradictory results obtained in previous studies are due to divergences in the methods used to operationalize one, or more, of the variables to be analysed. The main contribution made by our work stems from the fact that the empirical analysis performs a more thorough breakdown of the definitions of the size variable used in the literature. This may well be a first step toward justifying the differences in the results of the primary studies that analyse the relation under examination.

Key Words: innovation • meta-analysis • moderating variables • size

Organization Studies, Vol. 25, No. 3, 331-361 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840604040039


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Wollebaek Age, Size and Change in Local Voluntary Associations Acta Sociologica, December 1, 2009; 52(4): 365 - 384. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Damanpour and M. Schneider Characteristics of Innovation and Innovation Adoption in Public Organizations: Assessing the Role of Managers J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 1, 2009; 19(3): 495 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Dougherty Bridging Social Constraint and Social Action to Design Organizations for Innovation Organization Studies, March 1, 2008; 29(3): 415 - 434. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. C Okafor and J. Thomas III Presence of Innovation Adoption-Facilitating Elements in Hospitals, and Relationship to Implementation of Clinical Guidelines Ann. Pharmacother., March 1, 2008; 42(3): 354 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Bengtsson, H. Boter, and V. Vanyushyn Integrating the Internet and Marketing Operations: A Study of Antecedents in Firms of Different Size International Small Business Journal, February 1, 2007; 25(1): 27 - 48. [Abstract] [PDF]