This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Shamir, B. Articles by Lapidot, Y. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Trust in Organizational Superiors: Systemic and Collective Considerations

Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, msshamir{at}mscc.huji.ac.il

Yael Lapidot

College of Management, Tel Aviv, Israel, ylapidot{at}colman.ac.il

The social-psychological literature on trust in organizational superiors implies that it is an interpersonal phenomenon, based on the superior’s behaviours and on subordinates’ perceptions of the superior’s behaviours and qualities. The sociological literature, in contrast, implies that trust in a superior is a property of the system in which the superior-subordinate relationship is embedded. In this article, we suggest that trust is both an interpersonal and a collective phenomenon and focus on the linkages between three levels of trust: the system level, the group level, and the individual level. We use a longitudinal quantitative analysis of cadets’ trust in their team commanders and a qualitative analysis of critical incidents of trust building and erosion to develop and support three propositions. First, trust in a superior reflects subordinates’ trust in the system that the superior represents. Second, subordinates employ criteria derived from systemic properties such as collective identities and values to evaluate the trustworthiness of their superior. Third, team processes play a major role in the social construction of trust in a superior and in translating systemic considerations into criteria for evaluating superiors’ trustworthiness.

Key Words: trust • leaders • teams • values • identity

Organization Studies, Vol. 24, No. 3, 463-491 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840603024003912


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Van Maele and M. Van Houtte Faculty Trust and Organizational School Characteristics: An Exploration Across Secondary Schools in Flanders Educational Administration Quarterly, October 1, 2009; 45(4): 556 - 589. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. S. Kearney and J. K. Mathers Rooms With a View Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, June 1, 2007; 10(2): 1 - 18. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. J. Lewicki, E. C. Tomlinson, and N. Gillespie Models of Interpersonal Trust Development: Theoretical Approaches, Empirical Evidence, and Future Directions Journal of Management, December 1, 2006; 32(6): 991 - 1022. [Abstract] [PDF]