This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Grey, C. Articles by Garsten, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Trust, Control and Post-Bureaucracy

Judge Institute of Management Studies, University of Cambridge, UK

Christina Garsten

Score, University of Stockholm and Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden

This paper is a contribution to the analysis of intra-organizational trust. From a discussion of concepts of trust, we suggest that trust is something which is constructed for and by people in organizations, thereby producing some degree of predictability. Trust is a precarious social accomplishment enacted through the interplay of social or discursive structures, including those of work organizations, and individuated subjects. We argue that bureaucratic organizations effected this construction in such an efficient manner that it `disappeared' as an issue for organizational theorists, but that shifting organizational forms have re-opened it. We suggest that the advent of corporate culturism in the 1980s offered one kind of reconfiguration of trust in organizations. However, subsequent extensions of organizational reform have undermined corporate culture as a way of constructing trust. These extensions, which, with some caveats, may be called post-bureaucratic, have brought with them new potential bases for trust, and hence control, in organizations. We explore these in two ways. First, we discuss how various types of managerial languages and techniques have the capacity to provide a global `script' through which particular local contexts can be made sense of, and which allow possible subject positions and identities to be secured. Second, we develop this discussion with reference to two different kinds of employees whose work is in some senses post-bureaucratic: accountants and consultants in Big Five firms, and temporary workers (temps) working through agencies to provide clerical and other services. In a conclusion, we comment on the durability of post-bureaucratic modes of trust

Key Words: trust • post-bureaucracy • control • power

Organization Studies, Vol. 22, No. 2, 229-250 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840601222003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Moisander and S. Stenfors Exploring the Edges of Theory-Practice Gap: Epistemic Cultures in Strategy-Tool Development and Use Organization, March 1, 2009; 16(2): 227 - 247. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Y. Wang and S. Clegg Managing to Lead in Private Enterprises in China: Work Values, Demography and the Development of Trust Leadership, May 1, 2007; 3(2): 149 - 172. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Vaast What Goes Online Comes Offline: Knowledge Management System Use in a Soft Bureaucracy Organization Studies, March 1, 2007; 28(3): 283 - 306. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Hendry Educating Managers for Post-bureaucracy: The Role of the Humanities Management Learning, September 1, 2006; 37(3): 267 - 281. [Abstract] [PDF]

				X. Huang and E. Van de Vliert Job Formalization and Cultural Individualism as Barriers to Trust in Management International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, August 1, 2006; 6(2): 221 - 242. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Alvesson and M. Robertson The Best and the Brightest: The Construction, Significance and Effects of Elite Identities in Consulting Firms Organization, March 1, 2006; 13(2): 195 - 224. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Mollering The Trust/Control Duality: An Integrative Perspective on Positive Expectations of Others International Sociology, September 1, 2005; 20(3): 283 - 305. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Korczynski and U. Ott Sales Work under Marketization: The Social Relations of the Cash Nexus? Organization Studies, May 1, 2005; 26(5): 707 - 728. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. E. Hodgson Project Work: The Legacy of Bureaucratic Control in the Post-Bureaucratic Organization Organization, January 1, 2004; 11(1): 81 - 100. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Raisanen and A. Linde Technologizing Discourse to Standardize Projects in Multi-Project Organizations: Hegemony by Consensus? Organization, January 1, 2004; 11(1): 101 - 121. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Shamir and Y. Lapidot Trust in Organizational Superiors: Systemic and Collective Considerations Organization Studies, March 1, 2003; 24(3): 463 - 491. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Grey What are Business Schools for? On Silence and Voice in Management Education Journal of Management Education, October 1, 2002; 26(5): 496 - 511. [Abstract] [PDF]