|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Institutional Adaptiveness, Technology Policy, and the Diffusion of New Business Models: The Case of German Biotechnology
Steven Casper
Judge Institute for Management Studies, Cambridge University, UK
The German economy has been widely seen as failing to develop the commercial innovation competencies necessary to compete in new technologies. Starting in the mid-1990s, the German government instituted a series of new technology policies designed to orchestrate the development of small entrepreneurial technology firms. These policies have fostered several hundred new high-technology start-ups in Germany. This development represents an interesting challenge to prevailing institutional theory, which tends to view the characteristics of organizations as strongly constrained by the orientation of a number of key national institutional frameworks. Focusing on biotechnology, this article examines the relative importance of national institutional frameworks as opposed to sector-specific policies that are presently pervasive in Germany. Analysis of the new firms demonstrates that Germany's new technology policies have facilitated important extensions within the business system that have, for the first time, allowed the systematic promotion of entrepreneurial technology companies. However, the dominant strategies of market specialization and company organizational patterns found within these companies have been strongly influenced by incentives and constraints created by long-established national institutional structures. Technology policy has, however, promoted institutional adaptiveness by providing opportunities for firms to experiment with or reconfigure elements of relatively stable national institutional frameworks to create new business practices.
Key Words: institutional theory • national systems of innovation • biotechnology • varieties of capitalism • entrepreneurialism
Organization Studies, Vol. 21, No. 5,
887-914 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840600215003
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
K. Lange
Institutional embeddedness and the strategic leeway of actors: the case of the German therapeutical biotech industry
Socioecon. Rev.,
April 1, 2009;
7(2):
181 - 207.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Casper
Can new technology firms succeed in coordinated market economies? A response to Herrmann and Lange
Socioecon. Rev.,
April 1, 2009;
7(2):
209 - 215.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Whitley
Project-based firms: new organizational form or variations on a theme?
Ind. Corp. Change,
February 1, 2006;
15(1):
77 - 99.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. S. Tsui-Auch
Bureaucratic Rationality and Nodal Agency in a Developmental State: The Case of State-Led Biotechnology Development in Singapore
International Sociology,
December 1, 2004;
19(4):
451 - 477.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.-C. Hung
Explaining the process of innovation: The dynamic reconciliation of action and structure
Human Relations,
November 1, 2004;
57(11):
1479 - 1497.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Whitley
From the Search for Universal Correlations to the Institutional Structuring of Economic Organization and Change: The Development and Future of Organization Studies
Organization,
August 1, 2003;
10(3):
481 - 501.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Whitley
The Institutional Structuring of Organizational Capabilities: The Role of Authority Sharing and Organizational Careers
Organization Studies,
June 1, 2003;
24(5):
667 - 695.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
