Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lane, C.
Right arrow Articles by Quack, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Social Dimensions of Risk: Bank Financing of SMEs in Britain and Germany

Christel Lane

Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Cambridge,UK

Sigrid Quack

Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, Germany

This paper develops a sociological perspective on the comparative study of risk in the bank financing of small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) in Britain and Germany. It combines an institutionalist analysis with Luhmann's (1993) and Douglas and Wildavsky's (1982) sociological theories of risk. Drawing on these theories, it is suggested that the decision-making process is a social process in which regulative, normative and cognitive institutional effects influence the perception and management of risk. Aspects of the institutional environment which relate to the bank financing of SMEs in general and risk management in particular are examined. The paper then reviews the evidence in this field presented in the existing secondary literature in the light of the theoretical approach developed and explores how various kinds of institutional mechanisms and other environmental factors influence aspects of decision making in relation to risk. The overall conclusions relate our findings to the literature on business systems.

Key Words: institutions • business systems • risk • banking • financing of SMEs

Organization Studies, Vol. 20, No. 6, 987-1010 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840699206004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
K. D. Miller
Organizational Risk after Modernism
Organization Studies, February 1, 2009; 30(2-3): 157 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]