Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garsten, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Betwixt and between: Temporary Employees as Liminal Subjects in Flexible Organizations

Christina Garsten

Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research, Stockholm University, Sweden

As organizations change to become more flexible and transient, the use of a flexible workforce becomes an attractive solution. Temporary employees are here tentatively viewed as being `betwixt and between' organizational structures, in transit between the relatively fixed positions of full-time, regular employment. Building on previous fieldwork and recent interviews among temporary employees in Sweden and the US, the notion of liminality is employed to explore aspects of temporary work. The liminal position of `temporaries', it is suggested, is an ambiguous position involving both risks and opportunities for individuals, temporary staffing agencies, and client organizations alike. It may be seen as a seedbed of cultural creativity, where old perspectives on work and subjectivity are contested and new ones created. Related to the transient, mobile character of temporary employment, is an enhanced awareness of substitutability and a continuous reflexive monitoring of manners and competencies. Furthermore, the mobile and temporary character of assignments lead to the development of transient and episodic imagined communities of the workplace.

Through the lens of liminality then, temporal and contractual flexibilization of work is seen to challenge the old boundaries of industrial society and to suggest new ways of organizing and experiencing work, as well as new ways of constructing organizational subjectivity.

Key Words: flexible workforce • temporary work • organizational change • subjectivity • reflexivity • liminality

Organization Studies, Vol. 20, No. 4, 601-617 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0170840699204004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
S. Hall
Ecologies of business education and the geographies of knowledge
Progress in Human Geography, October 1, 2009; 33(5): 599 - 618.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
R. Simpson, J. Sturges, and P. Weight
Transient, unsettling and creative space: Experiences of liminality through the accounts of Chinese students on a UK-based MBA
Management Learning, February 1, 2009; 41(1): 53 - 70.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ENTERPRISE SOCHome page
C. Forde
"You know we are not an Employment Agency": Manpower, Government, and the Development of the Temporary Help Industry in Britain
Enterprise Soc., June 1, 2008; 9(2): 337 - 365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
D. J. O'Connell, E. McNeely, and D. T. Hall
Unpacking Personal Adaptability at Work
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, February 1, 2008; 14(3): 248 - 259.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
S. Tempest, K. Starkey, and C. Ennew
In the Death Zone: A study of limits in the 1996 Mount Everest disaster
Human Relations, July 1, 2007; 60(7): 1039 - 1064.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
A. Sturdy, M. Schwarz, and A. Spicer
Guess who's coming to dinner? Structures and uses of liminality in strategic management consultancy
Human Relations, July 1, 2006; 59(7): 929 - 960.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ECON GEOGRHome page
G. Grabher and O. Ibert
Bad company? The ambiguity of personal knowledge networks
J. Econ. Geogr., June 1, 2006; 6(3): 251 - 271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
D. Carlone
The Ambiguous Nature of a Management Guru Lecture: Providing Answers While Deepening Uncertainty
Journal of Business Communication, April 1, 2006; 43(2): 89 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
C. Casey and P. Alach
'Just a Temp?': Women, Temporary Employment and Lifestyle
Work Employment Society, September 1, 2004; 18(3): 459 - 480.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
A. Haunschild
Managing Employment Relationships in Flexible Labour Markets: The Case of German Repertory Theatres
Human Relations, August 1, 2003; 56(8): 899 - 929.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
B. Czarniawska and C. Mazza
Consulting as a Liminal Space
Human Relations, March 1, 2003; 56(3): 267 - 290.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
R. L. Moreland and J. M. Levine
Socialization and Trust in Work Groups
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2002; 5(3): 185 - 201.
[Abstract] [PDF]