|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Top Management Pay: Impact of Overt and Covert Power
Harry G. Barkema
Department of Business Administration, Tilburg University, Netherlands
Johannes M. Pennings
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, USA
This paper examines variations in executive pay as a function of CEO power. We assume that CEOs optimize their pay conditional upon their ability to shape decisions that favour their interests. Power is inferred from overt manifestations such as share holdings, but also from covert sources such as a CEOs' social capital. Two components of compensation are considered: base pay and bonus. While financial performance, firm size, and other factors are held constant, the results show overt power as measured by CEO, and CEO-family equity holdings, to have a curvilinear relationship with executive compensation. Proxies of covert power include tenure, being (one of) the founder(s), and firm diversification. These variables magnify or moderate the effect of equity holdings on compensation. The power effects are most pronounced for the size of CEO bonus.
Key Words: executive compensation shareholdings corporate governance power agency theory
Organization Studies, Vol. 19, No. 6,
975-1003 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/017084069801900604

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. P. Scheitle
2007 Robert J. McNamara Student Paper Award Winner * Leadership Compensation in Christian Nonprofits
Sociology of Religion,
December 1, 2009;
70(4):
384 - 408.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. E. Devers, A. A. Cannella JR, G. P. Reilly, and M. E. Yoder
Executive Compensation: A Multidisciplinary Review of Recent Developments
Journal of Management,
December 1, 2007;
33(6):
1016 - 1072.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. R. Greve and H. Mitsuhashi
Power and Glory: Concentrated Power in Top Management Teams
Organization Studies,
August 1, 2007;
28(8):
1197 - 1221.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Fernandez-Alles, G. Cuevas-Rodriguez, and R. Valle-Cabrera
How symbolic remuneration contributes to the legitimacy of the company: An institutional explanation
Human Relations,
July 1, 2006;
59(7):
961 - 992.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Mitsuhashi and H. R. Greve
Powerful and Free: Intraorganizational Power and the Dynamics of Corporate Strategy
Strategic Organization,
May 1, 2004;
2(2):
107 - 132.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. V. Ryan and M. Schneider
Institutional Investor Power and Heterogeneity: Implications for Agency and Stakeholder Theories
Business Society,
December 1, 2003;
42(4):
398 - 429.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Veliyath and K. Ramaswamy
Social Embeddedness, Overt and Covert Power, and Their Effects on CEO Pay: An Empirical Examination Among Family Businesses in India
Family Business Review,
December 1, 2000;
13(4):
293 - 311.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|