Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barkema, H. G.
Right arrow Articles by Pennings, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Top Management Pay: Impact of Overt and Covert Power

Harry G. Barkema

Department of Business Administration, Tilburg University, Netherlands

Johannes M. Pennings

The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, USA

This paper examines variations in executive pay as a function of CEO power. We assume that CEOs optimize their pay conditional upon their ability to shape decisions that favour their interests. Power is inferred from overt manifestations such as share holdings, but also from covert sources such as a CEOs' social capital. Two components of compensation are considered: base pay and bonus. While financial performance, firm size, and other factors are held constant, the results show overt power as measured by CEO, and CEO-family equity holdings, to have a curvilinear relationship with executive compensation. Proxies of covert power include tenure, being (one of) the founder(s), and firm diversification. These variables magnify or moderate the effect of equity holdings on compensation. The power effects are most pronounced for the size of CEO bonus.

Key Words: executive compensation • shareholdings • corporate governance • power • agency theory

Organization Studies, Vol. 19, No. 6, 975-1003 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/017084069801900604


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Sociology of ReligionHome page
C. P. Scheitle
2007 Robert J. McNamara Student Paper Award Winner * Leadership Compensation in Christian Nonprofits
Sociology of Religion, December 1, 2009; 70(4): 384 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
C. E. Devers, A. A. Cannella JR, G. P. Reilly, and M. E. Yoder
Executive Compensation: A Multidisciplinary Review of Recent Developments
Journal of Management, December 1, 2007; 33(6): 1016 - 1072.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
H. R. Greve and H. Mitsuhashi
Power and Glory: Concentrated Power in Top Management Teams
Organization Studies, August 1, 2007; 28(8): 1197 - 1221.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
M. Fernandez-Alles, G. Cuevas-Rodriguez, and R. Valle-Cabrera
How symbolic remuneration contributes to the legitimacy of the company: An institutional explanation
Human Relations, July 1, 2006; 59(7): 961 - 992.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Strategic OrganizationHome page
H. Mitsuhashi and H. R. Greve
Powerful and Free: Intraorganizational Power and the Dynamics of Corporate Strategy
Strategic Organization, May 1, 2004; 2(2): 107 - 132.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
L. V. Ryan and M. Schneider
Institutional Investor Power and Heterogeneity: Implications for Agency and Stakeholder Theories
Business Society, December 1, 2003; 42(4): 398 - 429.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Family Business ReviewHome page
R. Veliyath and K. Ramaswamy
Social Embeddedness, Overt and Covert Power, and Their Effects on CEO Pay: An Empirical Examination Among Family Businesses in India
Family Business Review, December 1, 2000; 13(4): 293 - 311.
[Abstract] [PDF]