Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lam, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Embedded Firms, Embedded Knowledge: Problems of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in Global Cooperative Ventures

Alice Lam

Canterbury Business School. University of Kent, U.K.

Research on global cooperative ventures has tended to focus on governance forms and task structures. This study highlights the importance of knowledge structures and work systems in influencing the success of collaborative ventures. Based on an empirical analysis of a close collaboration in the knowledge-intensive area between a Japanese and a British high-technology firm, it illustrates how the socially embedded nature of knowledge can impede cross-border collaborative work and knowledge transfer. The research has applied and extended Michael Polanyi's con cept of 'tacit knowledge' in a much wider context. It develops a conceptual frame work for analyzing the main differences and 'points of friction' between the Japanese 'organizational' and the British 'professional' models of the organization of knowledge in high-level technical work. It shows how the dominant form of knowledge held in organizations, its degree of tacitness, and the way in which it is structured, utilized and transmitted can vary considerably between firms in dif ferent societal settings. These differences are shown to have contributed to project failures, weakened the technological relationship between the partner firms over time and led to asymmetry in knowledge transfer.

Key Words: Descriptors: knowledge transfer • technology and organization • tacit knowledge • cross-cultural management • cooperation • strategic alliances

Organization Studies, Vol. 18, No. 6, 973-996 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/017084069701800604


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
U. Lichtenthaler and H. Ernst
Intermediary Services in the Markets for Technology: Organizational Antecedents and Performance Consequences
Organization Studies, July 1, 2008; 29(7): 1003 - 1035.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
D. Faems, M. Janssens, and B. van Looy
The Initiation and Evolution of Interfirm Knowledge Transfer in R&D Relationships
Organization Studies, November 1, 2007; 28(11): 1699 - 1728.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
S. Collinson and D. C. Wilson
Inertia in Japanese Organizations: Knowledge Management Routines and Failure to Innovate
Organization Studies, September 1, 2006; 27(9): 1359 - 1387.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
K. A. Munir
Being Different: How Normative and Cognitive Aspects of Institutional Environments Influence Technology Transfer
Human Relations, December 1, 2002; 55(12): 1403 - 1428.
[Abstract] [PDF]