Organization Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reed, M. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Organization Studies, Vol. 18, No. 1, 21-42 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/017084069701800103

In Praise of Duality and Dualism: Rethinking Agency and Structure in Organizational Analysis

Michael I. Reed

Department of Behaviour in Organizations, The Management School, Lancaster University, U.K.

This paper develops a critique of a number of highly influential theoretical interventions in contemporary organizational analysis that have collapsed structure into agency. It suggests that these approaches, which draw, in various ways, on the 'postmodern turn' in organizational analysis, have seriously weakened the explanatory power and political imagination of the latter. In direct contrast to theoretical approaches based on flat or compacted social onto logies, the paper supports a critical realist position as providing a layered or stratified social ontology on which a more structurally robust and inclusive explanations of organizational phenomena can be constructed. By adopting a realist ontology and methodology, organizational analysis will be much better placed to understand and explain the interplay between structure and agency, and its 'fateful' consequences for social actors.

Key Words: Descriptors: agency • structure • critical realism • postmodernism • organizational analysis • politics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
J. Lok
Book Review: John Hassard, Mihaela Kelemen, Julie Wolfram Cox: Disorganization Theory: Explorations in Alternative Organizational Analysis: 2008 Routledge, London and New York 221 pp + xviii, ISBN: 978--0-415--41729--7
Organization Studies, June 1, 2008; 29(6): 909 - 913.
[PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
A. Whittle and A. Spicer
Is Actor Network Theory Critique?
Organization Studies, April 1, 2008; 29(4): 611 - 629.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
R. Caldwell
Agency and Change: Re-evaluating Foucault's Legacy
Organization, November 1, 2007; 14(6): 769 - 791.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
A. Spicer and S. Bohm
Moving Management: Theorizing Struggles against the Hegemony of Management
Organization Studies, November 1, 2007; 28(11): 1667 - 1698.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing TheoryHome page
L. Araujo
Markets, market-making and marketing
Marketing Theory, September 1, 2007; 7(3): 211 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
T. Kuhn and K. Lee Ashcraft
Corporate Scandal and the Theory of the Firm: Formulating the Contributions of Organizational Communication Studies
Management Communication Quarterly, August 1, 2003; 17(1): 20 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
T. Keenoy, C. Oswick, and D. Grant
Organizational Discourses: Text and Context
Organization, May 1, 1997; 4(2): 147 - 157.