Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, K.
Right arrow Articles by Oliver, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Responses by Professional Organizations to Multiple and Ambiguous Institutional Environments: The Case of AIDS

Kathleen Montgomery

Graduate School of Management, University of California, Riverside, U.S.A.

Amalya L. Oliver

Department of Sociology, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

Kathleen Montgomery

Graduate School of Management, University of California, Riverside, U.S.A.

Amalya L. Oliver

Department of Sociology, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

In this paper we examine responses to multiple and ambiguous pressures gener ated by the environmental threat of AIDS. Using an institutional theory frame work and insights from professional dominance theory, we develop a two- dimensional typology, incorporating the belief systems of important constituents and the degree of institutional rules, to explain the patterns of organizational adoption of AIDS-related policies and related professional prac tices. Hypotheses are tested with data from a national survey of hospitals (n= 506), with interviews from administrators and chiefs of medicine. Results sup port the usefulness of the explanatory schema for patterns of organizational policy adoption; the schema also provides a stronger explanation of pro fessional behaviour patterns than does the existence of policies requiring such behaviour. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings for professional organizations in the context of environmental threats are discussed.

Key Words: Descriptors: professional dominance • institutional theory • AIDS policies and practices • hospitals

Organization Studies, Vol. 17, No. 4, 649-671 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/017084069601700405


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
J. A.A. Sillince, G. Harindranath, and C. E. Harvey
Getting Acceptance that Radically New Working Practices are Required: Institutionalization of Arguments about Change within a Healthcare Organization
Human Relations, November 1, 2001; 54(11): 1421 - 1454.
[Abstract] [PDF]