Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ackroyd, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Organization Contra Organizations: Professions and Organizational Change in the United Kingdom

Stephen Ackroyd

The Management School, University of Lancaster, U.K.

Professions in the United Kingdom have been periodically marginalized and their growth suspended, but they have shown considerable capacity to adapt. The evolution of 'new model' professions at the end of the last century and the beginning of the present one, which occurred without governmental regula tion or patronage, was associated with the development of an effective and independent form of occupational organization for professional groups. This organization combines control of the labour market with informal cooperation and control within employing organizations, and is identified as a form of occupational 'double closure'. It is characteristic for occupations organized in this sort of way to become encapsulated groups or quasi organizations within formal organizations. This argument is developed in the body of the paper through a consideration of the contemporary situation of professionals in man ufacturing industry and the public services, where new model professions have established themselves firmly in the present century, and where there are some very similar informal structures. The influence of current social and economic change on these forms of professional organization is then discussed, and it is argued that although they are clearly embattled in some of the areas of their traditional strength, because of their developed organizational attributes, professional groups are likely to persist. Contemporary management of profes sional services is not without difficulty in these circumstances; and, in areas where professions are well-established, re-organization is taking place round encapsulated professional groups rather than by re-constructing them. Despite some superficial similarities, therefore, the management of services is different between traditional professional services and newer commercial ones. More over, if the account of professional self-organization developed here is a reli able guide, in the longer term we may expect it to extend to new services, despite current differences in their organization and forms of managerial control.

Key Words: Descriptors: professions • closure • double closure • organizational change • professional response

Organization Studies, Vol. 17, No. 4, 599-621 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/017084069601700403


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
U. Eriksson-Zetterquist, K. Lindberg, and A. Styhre
When the good times are over: Professionals encountering new technology
Human Relations, August 1, 2009; 62(8): 1145 - 1170.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
G. Currie, R. Finn, and G. Martin
Accounting for the `dark side' of new organizational forms: The case of healthcare professionals
Human Relations, April 1, 2008; 61(4): 539 - 564.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
J. Faulconbridge and D. Muzio
Organizational professionalism in globalizing law firms
Work Employment Society, March 1, 2008; 22(1): 7 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
G. McGivern and E. Ferlie
Playing tick-box games: Interrelating defences in professional appraisal
Human Relations, September 1, 2007; 60(9): 1361 - 1385.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
C. Carter and F. Mueller
The 'Long March' of the Management Modernizers: Ritual, Rhetoric and Rationality
Human Relations, November 1, 2002; 55(11): 1325 - 1354.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
J. McAuley, J. Duberley, and L. Cohen
The Meaning Professionals Give to Management... and Strategy
Human Relations, January 1, 2000; 53(1): 87 - 116.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
IFLA JournalHome page
L. A. Herrera and R. R. Pereyra
Review of the Management Literature 1996
IFLA Journal, January 1, 1997; 23(5-6): 371 - 380.
[PDF]