Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fineman, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Emotional Subtexts in Corporate Greening

Stephen Fineman

School of Management, University of Bath, U.K.

This paper explores the view that pro-environmental organizational changes depend on the emotional meanings that managers attribute to greening. It is theoretically rooted in recent literatures on the strategic role of emotions and green organizational transformation. A comparative, qualitative study of senior managers in six U.K. supermarkets, of differing degrees of greenness, is reported. Four emotionally significant subtexts are identified: enacting green commitment, contesting green boundaries, defending autonomy and avoiding embarrassment. These are related to the way different green pressures are received, developed and culturally incorporated — or rejected. The study finds little evidence to support the emotional basis of 'true' ethically green organiza tional cultures, although managerially engineered commitment of 'belonging' to a socially responsible culture can serve some aspects of greening in a rela tively stable manner. The less-green companies are instrumental in their responses, have few corporate symbols of community or care and their man agers will deprecate or demonize those who believe otherwise. The implica tions for green organizational change suggest a key expressive role for leaders in shaping an appropriate climate. However, this is far from fool-proof, and is not suited to all organizations. Pressure from external green activists and regulators offer more coercive routes, based on creating fear, shame or embarrassment.

Key Words: Descriptors: greening • emotions • ethics • culture • change

Organization Studies, Vol. 17, No. 3, 479-500 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/017084069601700306


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
P. Bansal and J. Gao
Building the Future by Looking to the Past: Examining Research Published on Organizations and Environment
Organization Environment, December 1, 2006; 19(4): 458 - 478.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
S. M. Livesey
Eco-Identity as Discursive Struggle: Royal Dutch/Shell, Brent Spar, and Nigeria
Journal of Business Communication, January 1, 2001; 38(1): 58 - 91.
[Abstract] [PDF]