Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rodrigues, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Collinson, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

'Having Fun'?: Humour as Resistance in Brazil

Suzana B. Rodrigues

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil, Judge Institute of Management, University of Cambridge U.K.

David L. Collinson

Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, U.K.

Highlighting the under-researched interrelationship between workplace humour and resistance, this paper examines employee opposition in a Brazilian telecommunications company. Much of the literature on corporate culture and humour has emphasized the way that 'having fun' can facilitate production. Functionalist in perspective, such studies treat organizational joking both as a means by which employees can 'let off steam' and as a flexible tool for man agers in reinforcing corporate culture. Questioning the universality of this 'safety-valve' theory of humour, our empirical analysis suggests that humour may be a relatively effective means of expressing employee dissatisfaction especially where more overt forms of resistance might provoke managerial reprisals.

Key Words: Descriptors: humour • resistance • safety-valve theory • satire • cartoons • animal metaphors

Organization Studies, Vol. 16, No. 5, 739-768 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/017084069501600501


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EthnographyHome page
A. Schoneboom
Diary of a working boy: Creative resistance among anonymous workbloggers
Ethnography, December 1, 2007; 8(4): 403 - 423.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
A. Spicer and S. Bohm
Moving Management: Theorizing Struggles against the Hegemony of Management
Organization Studies, November 1, 2007; 28(11): 1667 - 1698.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
H. M. Zoller and G. T. Fairhurst
Resistance leadership: The overlooked potential in critical organization and leadership studies
Human Relations, September 1, 2007; 60(9): 1331 - 1360.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
C. Grey and A. Sturdy
Friendship and Organizational Analysis: Toward a Research Agenda
Journal of Management Inquiry, June 1, 2007; 16(2): 157 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
LeadershipHome page
J. Holmes
Humour and the Construction of Maori Leadership at Work
Leadership, February 1, 2007; 3(1): 5 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
I. Grugulis
Nothing Serious? Candidates' Use of Humour in Management Training
Human Relations, April 1, 2002; 55(4): 387 - 406.
[Abstract] [PDF]