Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Czarniawska-Joerges, B.
Right arrow Articles by Wolff, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Leaders, Managers, Entrepreneurs on and off the Organizational Stage

Barbara Czarniawska-Joerges

Department of Business Administration, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

Rolf Wolff

Gothenburg Research Institute at the School of Economics and Legal Science, Gothenburg, Sweden

This paper explores three crucial roles of the organizational theatre: managers, leaders and entrepreneurs. Changing fashion in the organizational theory debate as well as in organizational practice puts different roles in focus at different times. Organization theory should, accordingly, shift its attention toward studying the contexts in which a given role acquires dominance, in place of an unreflective discussion of the relative functional advantages of each of them. This paper argues that none of the three will ever go out of fashion, as they can be seen as enactments of archetypes, embodying the different fears and hopes of those who create organizations by their daily performance. Leadership is seen as symbolic performance, expressing the hope of control over destiny; management as the activity of introducing order by coordinating flows of things and people towards collective action, and entrepreneurship as the making of entire new worlds. The sociohistorical context needs to be considered as the stage-set wherein these roles gain prominence.

Organization Studies, Vol. 12, No. 4, 529-546 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/017084069101200404


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
OrganizationHome page
D. De Clercq and M. Voronov
The Role of Domination in Newcomers' Legitimation as Entrepreneurs
Organization, November 1, 2009; 16(6): 799 - 827.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
W. S. Jacobson, C. K. Palus, and C. J. Bowling
A Woman's Touch? Gendered Management and Performance in State Administration
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 24, 2009; (2009) mup017v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LeadershipHome page
A. Trethewey and H.L. Goodall JR
Leadership Reconsidered as Historical Subject: Sketches from the Cold War to Post-9/11
Leadership, November 1, 2007; 3(4): 457 - 477.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of EntrepreneurshipHome page
D. Schwartz and A. Malach-Pines
High Technology Entrepreneurs versus Small Business Owners in Israel
Journal of Entrepreneurship, March 1, 2007; 16(1): 1 - 17.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clinical Case StudiesHome page
A. M. Pines
The Female Entrepreneur: Burnout Treated Using a Psychodynamic Existential Approach
Clinical Case Studies, April 1, 2002; 1(2): 170 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]